F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop 10600k OC versus 5600X at 360Hz

10600k OC versus 5600X at 360Hz

10600k OC versus 5600X at 360Hz

T
Thepiggy2005
Member
161
01-07-2020, 03:09 PM
#1
I'm torn between a 10600k build aiming for high overclocking and a 5600X paired with your 360Hz panel. My Valorant gameplay is mostly competitive, but benchmarks on YouTube with a 3060ti don't look great. Would you know any Valorant players with comparable builds who can advise me? The machine is designed for this kind of setup—no distractions, just e-sports focus.
T
Thepiggy2005
01-07-2020, 03:09 PM #1

I'm torn between a 10600k build aiming for high overclocking and a 5600X paired with your 360Hz panel. My Valorant gameplay is mostly competitive, but benchmarks on YouTube with a 3060ti don't look great. Would you know any Valorant players with comparable builds who can advise me? The machine is designed for this kind of setup—no distractions, just e-sports focus.

R
ripa5000
Posting Freak
884
01-07-2020, 03:32 PM
#2
Ryzen 5600X i5-10600K at 5GHz still underperforms. Even when matched against similar models, the 5600X outperforms the i5-10600K. It operates at reduced stock and higher boost speeds.
R
ripa5000
01-07-2020, 03:32 PM #2

Ryzen 5600X i5-10600K at 5GHz still underperforms. Even when matched against similar models, the 5600X outperforms the i5-10600K. It operates at reduced stock and higher boost speeds.

T
Thesnake9
Member
160
01-09-2020, 06:03 AM
#3
Typically, with fast RAM and a high overclock, performance should match what you expect. The 5600X struggles with rapid RAM speeds, making it less impressive compared to newer options. While you can buy a 10600K regularly, the 5600X isn’t keeping up. Still, I’d keep the MSRP for the 5600X—$300 is steep, but it’s a solid choice.
T
Thesnake9
01-09-2020, 06:03 AM #3

Typically, with fast RAM and a high overclock, performance should match what you expect. The 5600X struggles with rapid RAM speeds, making it less impressive compared to newer options. While you can buy a 10600K regularly, the 5600X isn’t keeping up. Still, I’d keep the MSRP for the 5600X—$300 is steep, but it’s a solid choice.

U
54
01-15-2020, 04:10 AM
#4
I'll keep a close watch on microcenter then. Appreciate it.
U
ultraDragon005
01-15-2020, 04:10 AM #4

I'll keep a close watch on microcenter then. Appreciate it.

L
Lebt007
Member
77
01-15-2020, 05:40 AM
#5
I noticed that in the HardwareCanucks video, even with a 3090, achieving over 700 FPS seems impossible, particularly on ultra settings. It’s unclear where they conduct their testing—possibly in a training space with similar frames. That’s why I can’t trust those figures. I agree the 5600x is the better choice. Most videos using a 10600k are failing to hit 300+ FPS even at lower settings, and they’re all stock. An original creator likely wouldn’t be enough to close the performance gap.
L
Lebt007
01-15-2020, 05:40 AM #5

I noticed that in the HardwareCanucks video, even with a 3090, achieving over 700 FPS seems impossible, particularly on ultra settings. It’s unclear where they conduct their testing—possibly in a training space with similar frames. That’s why I can’t trust those figures. I agree the 5600x is the better choice. Most videos using a 10600k are failing to hit 300+ FPS even at lower settings, and they’re all stock. An original creator likely wouldn’t be enough to close the performance gap.